Liberty Rock is aware of an article published by Tax Policy Associates (TPA) on 14 May 2026. We have reviewed the article in full and consulted with our legal advisers. We are publishing this statement to address several serious concerns about the article’s accuracy, sourcing, and production.
We Do Not Accept the Characterisation of Our Services
Liberty Rock does not accept the characterisation of any of its services as fraudulent. That characterisation is contested, and the matter is the subject of ongoing legal proceedings. It would be inappropriate for us to make further detailed comments on the substance of those proceedings at this stage.
What we can say clearly is this: Liberty Rock has always sought to provide commercially sound services, professionally advised, and conducted in good faith. We reject any suggestion to the contrary.
Serious Concerns About TPA’s Sources and Methods
The TPA article relies heavily on documents which it describes as having been received from multiple independent sources. We have significant concerns about both the identity of those sources and their motivations.
Liberty Rock’s client materials are provided under explicit confidentiality obligations. The publication of those materials without authorisation, regardless of how they were obtained, raises serious questions that we are pursuing through appropriate legal channels. The confidential nature of these documents was clearly marked. That marking was disregarded.
We would note that anonymous sourcing does not make an accusation accurate. It makes it harder to scrutinise. In a matter as serious as an allegation of fraud against named individuals, the public interest standard requires more than the word of undisclosed parties with undisclosed motivations.
The Absence of a Meaningful Right of Reply
TPA states that Liberty Rock did not respond to contact attempts. [Legal to confirm and insert the accurate position on contact received and any response provided.]
We note that the purpose of contacting a subject before publication is to allow them to correct factual errors before they are published — not after. The opportunity to respond meaningfully to a draft of the article’s specific claims was not provided. A brief email request for comment is not a right of reply to allegations of criminal conduct.
What We Are Doing
We are working with specialist legal counsel to address the article through appropriate channels. This includes the factual inaccuracies it contains, the question of how confidential client documents were obtained and published, and the impact on the reputation of our firm and the individuals named within it.
We are not in a position to make further public comment on the substance of the legal matters referenced in the article while those matters are ongoing. We will communicate further as and when it is appropriate to do so.
To Our Clients and Professional Partners
We recognise that an article of this nature raises questions. We are available to speak directly with any existing client or professional partner who wishes to understand our position. Please contact us at [email address], and a senior member of our team will respond promptly and in confidence.
Liberty Rock’s commitment to our clients has not changed. We continue to provide the specialist advisory services for which we are instructed.
Liberty Rock Limited
8th of July, 2026
www.libertyrock.co.uk